I just watched Bob Fosse’s All That Jazz. More frightening, I just watched a plane disappear above the clouds.
The advice is insistent on how to deal with COVID. From the Stoics. It is part of the general onslaught, a how to of personal reconciliation that would be worthless were it not for the Romantic and soteriological tradition of personal salvation. (That would be the Romantic tradition of nationalist salvation and the soteriological tradition of personal salvation.) For example, suicide and the idea of a personal death. See Schopenhauer.
The two, nationalist and personal, are combined in the idea of Brexit:
Here is a snapshot of nationalist culture in auto-affectionate self-parody. And here is a portrait of Schopenhauer with his poodle.
painting inside my skull
it might be useful to think of it shaped like a donut.
and be not conformed to this world
— thanks Isaias Braga
“It was bad back then; society was diseased.”
— writes Julianna Baggott, Pure, (London, UK: Headline, 2012), 63.
“[He] imagines that this isn’t real, that, instead, it’s just some elaborate reenactment of destruction, not the actual destruction itself.
“He remembers once being in a museum … Each display was dedicated to a theme: before the impressive prison system was built, before difficult children were properly medicated, when feminism didn’t encourage femininity, when the media were hostile to government instead of working toward a greater good, before people with dangerous ideas were properly identified, back when government had to ask permission to protect its good citizens from the evils of the world and from the evils among us, before the gates had gone up around neighborhoods with buzzer systems and friendly men at gatehouses who knew everyone by name.”
— Ibid., 236.
“My body is the truth. It’s history.”
— Ibid. 413.
…
Notes, you might say. But don’t you think we are no longer free to float happily with fragments?
No need.
Yet the demand is more imposing than ever personally to reconcile the contradictions, that are quite public, evident in our political lives.
I would say that our political lives impose but that they are equally irreconcilable for being mutually incompatible, a clamping down here with a liberalisation there, liberalisation of cannabis or euthanasia laws with mandatory mask-wearing and the possibility of mass vaccination being mandatory as well.
The rift is not between the public and the private, making one irreconcilable to the other. It is a general crazing of the public to which the private is not equal, is not enough crazy.
There is no point of view given by state mandate but the mad movement of a conflicting polity, so that any attempt personally to reconcile oneself to it can only end in disaster.
Or in the absurdity of believing a conspiracy is behind it.
As we used to say, undercover of human malice or stupidity, the conspiracy of confusion and disinformation serving political ends–but this time, unpoliticisable, irrecuperable to any recognisable political viewpoint, ends set for self-destruct.
And yet, are we happy to be getting on with the craze of fragments?
There seems to be something like an expectation we ought to be able to understand we take on; we should be able to make sense and reconcile for ourselves the competing interests the results of which we can only anathematise.
That is we cannot undo them.
Cannot analyse them.
Slippery as,
…
So neonatology as well as neontology concern the study of neons.
…
courtesy Simon Wilson
(note cap)
One sometimes thinks that for a voyage to the depths of the human soul one needs a powerful submarine, and in the end is surprised to find oneself in a wetsuit trying to sink into a standard household bathtub.
— Andrés Barba, A Luminous Republic, Trans. Lisa Dillman, (New York, NY: Mariner Books, 2020), 11.
…the demands of international treaties trumped by nationalist interests…
…but also the ramifying in the nationalist arena of conflicting global interests…
It is worth restating these are not macro interests, rather a micro fragmenting … and this bespeaks a kind of vulnerability to the broader strokes–hammer blows–of which the Left seems to have become wary.
Given that you are a force of opposition, what do you want?
Calming devices used to be those narrow perspex boxes in which you could see and witness particulate sorting processes. Sometimes with oil.
Then diving you see a skate, a ray, shake off the sand in which it is camouflaged, and the sand settle.
…it settles without you doing a thing.
This is what you are watching slowly coming down–the pretence is that it happens quickly.
The pretence is that it can–that it can operate by some human, humanly imposed scale of time, of time reduced to the technologically available advanced scale of minute increments speeding past, speeding into the past under what Virilio calls dromological pressure. Speeding into the future. This is what you get speeding into the future.
This is what you get, I have been writing in my other writing: it is not speed except that it is communicable and the speed is of the communication. Which makes a joke of communication.
