February 2009

the curious case of Augusto Boal: invisible police & visible normality

I noticed that someone made a search for critics of Augusto Boal here, as if, it occurred to me, he doesn’t or wouldn’t have any. Of course he has had critics and written about them. He tells this story in “Invisible Theatre.” [Originally published 1990, trans. Susana Epstein, reprinted, in Re:direction, op.cit., pp. 112-121]

In 1978 Boal was involved in a workshop for Theatre of the Oppressed in Liège. A performance was organised for the last night of the workshop. The theatre was full and included a large number of immigrants and refugees, sans papières.

When backstage, Boal was approached by three men and a barking dog. One of the men produced an ID. Boal took them for police.

They asked to see his papers. Unsatisfied with those he produced, they asked him to leave with them.

An attendant member of Boal’s company came to his aid and pushed him through a door marked ‘Private.’ The logic being that police cannot enter private property without a warrant. The ambulatory or backstage area where the encounter occurred was presumably deemed public.

The three branches of the Belgian police were then telephoned, from the ‘private’ room, and asked what was going on. The ordinary police, the gendarmerie and the ‘antigang brigade’ denied any involvement or knowledge.

The audience was angry. They had been by this time waiting several hours.

One of the company noticed that another of the participants in the Theatre of the Oppressed workshop was looking increasingly uncomfortable. When questioned she finally gave out that the men with the barking dog were in fact from Cirque Divers and that the whole thing had been an experiment in Invisible Theatre. They had wanted to use Boal’s own techniques against him in protest at his not conducting a workshop with them.

Boal breaks from his narration, writing that Invisible Theatre was not invented by him. It pre-existed his formulation of it. It had been, indeed, invisible. Undercover cops have used and still use the same techniques.

He draws attention to the critical paradox of invisibility and visibility: the idea that if the audience is aware of what is happening as having been staged they are no longer participants but a normal audience. The first principle of the Invisible Theatre is to free the oppressed from merely being spectators.

Freed, they participate in the ‘change‘ brought about by the theatrical event. However, as spectators, they are subjected to a spectacle over which they may exercise no control: as in theatre, the wisdom runs, so in the political arena. The challenge to Boal, then, comes in the form of an Invisible Theatre in which the actors take on the roles of police, of the oppressors.

Boal doesn’t here write of that other problem of the Invisible Theatre: that it relies on innocent bystanders becoming participants without their knowledge; that it is a confidence trick, as dependent on the complicity of its actors (in fooling the audience) as is the theatre of the oppressors. The demagogue is always acting. The participation of his subjects precisely consists in their subjection. If they would not submit, the demagogue could not act and be effective.

In the case Boal brings, Invisible Theatre comes in as a criticism of ‘normal’ theatre – at the final production in a Theatre of the Oppressed workshop. The event takes place in a conventional theatre. Boal is aided in escaping the actors-as-oppressors by actors-as-oppressed.

Boal seems to be saying Invisible Theatre as he practices it does good and the experiment of Cirque Divers in doing bad is not therefore an adequate critique – either of him or of the techniques involved. But it’s all Invisible Theatre after all, even as the cops do it.

Is there a case to be made that what is at stake here is complicity? specifically the complicity of the actors with the oppressor(s)? Could you not say that whoever leads an Invisible Theatre experiment – in requiring complicity – is an oppressor?

Invisible Theatre does not even vouchsafe to its unwitting participants – as opposed to its instigating actors – the degree of freedom of being able to spectate!

Boal’s Invisible Theatre does not democratise – acting. In the event, the instigating actors are directors, leading, controlling, blocking behaviours and actions of those involuntarily performing and acting in a theatre of the oppressed in which and as which they are once more excluded and can have no say.

There is rich ground here for critique. It does seem to hinge on the visibility or invisibility of the ‘theatre.’

Theatre becomes a term in this context. Since it has a special meaning and does not problematise that meaning it falls short of being a concept.

It is not questioned that what is going on in Boal’s work is theatre. And, how can an invisible theatre question itself? Only in a ‘normal‘ theatre, in Liège could it do so, with Boal spirited away through a door marked ‘Private.’

...
detraque
Problematik
theatricality

Comments Off on the curious case of Augusto Boal: invisible police & visible normality

Permalink

Cat [Auburn] at C[ity] A[rt] R[ooms]: Rest Cure

– Cat Auburn, Rest Cure, 2009

inanimadvertisement
infemmarie
pique-assiettes

Comments Off on Cat [Auburn] at C[ity] A[rt] R[ooms]: Rest Cure

Permalink

A tribute to Jeff Koons’s mouldy balls

croydon
snap

Comments Off on A tribute to Jeff Koons’s mouldy balls

Permalink

This artist does that: Chinese Ash, American Flesh

– Zhang Huan, 12m², Beijing, 1994

Tehching Hsieh made me think of Zhang Huan’s endurance performances, like the beautiful one in which he leaked blood suspended above an electric hotplate in a Chinese warehouse, the audience informally seated around the walls, the blood spitting in miniature eruptions like lava from a tiny volcano. He has turned away from performance, it appears, and is making works using ash gathered from Buddhist shrines.

– Zhang Huan, My America, 1999

– Zhang Huan, Seeds, incense ash, charcoal & resin on canvas, 2007

hommangerie
inanimadvertisement
pique-assiettes
swweesaience
theatricality

Comments Off on This artist does that: Chinese Ash, American Flesh

Permalink

moin + LETTER TO TEHCHING HSIEH

– painting from here, text by Santiago Sierra (now)

hommangerie
imarginaleiro
inanimadvertisement
N-exile
pique-assiettes
swweesaience
textatics

Comments Off on moin + LETTER TO TEHCHING HSIEH

Permalink

an inverted hommage to the unknown creative soldier

– der unbekannte kreativsoldat

imarginaleiro
inanimadvertisement
pique-assiettes
swweesaience
Trans-European Express

Comments Off on an inverted hommage to the unknown creative soldier

Permalink

Taking liberties with the penetrated by Santiago Sierra

– Santiago Sierra, Los Penetrados, El Torax, Terrassa, España. 12 de Octubre de 2008, Quinto acto: 3 hombres de raza negra penetraron a 3 mujeres de raza negra.

inanimadvertisement
pique-assiettes
tagged
textasies

Comments Off on Taking liberties with the penetrated by Santiago Sierra

Permalink

Land of the Living from the Lives of the Saints series

snap
swweesaience

Comments Off on Land of the Living from the Lives of the Saints series

Permalink

Hate and the Angel

– Paul Klee, Angelus Novus

anciency

Comments Off on Hate and the Angel

Permalink

Protest against Section 92A – proposed for introduction in New Zealand on the 28th of February 2009. STOP GUILT UPON ACCUSATION LAWS

New Zealand's new Copyright Law presumes 'Guilt Upon Accusation' and will Cut Off Internet Connections without a trial. Join the black out protest against it!

New Zealand's new Copyright Law presumes 'Guilt Upon Accusation' and will Cut Off Internet Connections without a trial. CreativeFreedom.org.nz is against this unjust law - help us

advertisement
National Scandal
pique-assiettes

Comments Off on Protest against Section 92A – proposed for introduction in New Zealand on the 28th of February 2009. STOP GUILT UPON ACCUSATION LAWS

Permalink