To write a letter to performing artists? to the performing arts community? sector? to theatre practitioners? to theatre workers? poets, makers & workers? (wouldn’t wankers be next in the series?) to whom it may concern … ? interested parties? partisans? compagneros? erroristas? (see <<empyre>
…addressing the letter to ‘fools’ might be deemed insulting (you talking to me!?) although it’s adequate. (See: yurodovstvo, in a previous post.)
To write this letter to you whose work is theatre or would be if you had the money and to find out what is useful to me without sounding like a prig (too late!) or to ingratiate myself so as to be confided in or to be plain and speak plainly and state upfront why I’m asking the questions I’m asking, what am I asking? Are you now or have you ever been … or do you like to hang around in bars? (Which calls to mean a delightful conversation with a member of the New Theatre Initiative, Auckland, now the Q, who tried to convince me that in building a theatre the bar was the most important because it’s like the engine-room of creativity, where alliances are formed, collaborations seeded, new work planned, dreams come true, alcohol is consumed, schemes are hatched, cabals, and knives come out … no, not this last. You get the idea. The bar!)
What is useful to me to know from other theatre practitioners is what kind of THREAT they pose to the viability of my business idea, as competitors after the ‘arts dollar’ of which there is a limited supply, we suppose. But to formulate it like this is immediately not useful, since it’s to be a literalist, to use the SWOT tool unimaginatively.
If I am to exploit a milieu, theatre, here now local specific, Auckland, 08, … ah, when I was young, golden and invulnerable, as Rimbaud says in Christopher Hampton’s Total Eclipse.